Devanagari
ज्ञानमेकं पराचीनैरिन्द्रियैर्ब्रह्म निर्गुणम् ।
अवभात्यर्थरूपेण भ्रान्त्या शब्दादिधर्मिणा ॥ २८ ॥
Verse text
jṣānam ekaṁ parācīnair
indriyair brahma nirguṇam
avabhāty artha-rūpeṇa
bhrāntyā śabdādi-dharmiṇā
Synonyms
jṣānam
—
knowledge
;
ekam
—
one
;
parācīnaiḥ
—
averse
;
indriyaiḥ
—
by the senses
;
brahma
—
the Supreme Absolute Truth
;
nirguṇam
—
beyond the material modes
;
avabhāti
—
appears
;
artha
—
rūpeṇa — in the form of various objects
;
bhrāntyā
—
mistakenly
;
śabda
—
ādi — sound and so on
;
dharmiṇā
—
endowed with .
Translation
Those who are averse to the Transcendence realize the Supreme Absolute Truth differently through speculative sense perception, and therefore, because of mistaken speculation, everything appears to them to be relative.
Translation (Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura)
The one Brahman composed of consciousness alone, without qualities, appears by error through materially directed senses to take the form of various objects with qualities such as sound.
“I have a desire to perform bhakti, have heard about it and understood it. Curious about jṣāna and yoga, I have heard about them and understood them. But in jṣāna I have not understood completely about non-dual knowledge. Therefore explain that briefly.” Thus Kapila speaks about the jṣāna approved by the followers of the theory of vivarta. What is called the one knowledge or non-duality or Brahman falsely appears by error of the jīva to be objects endowed with qualities by the senses which are turned towards material enjoyment, stimulated by māyā-śakti (parācīnaiḥ). Thus the jīva thinks “This drum sounds nice, this woman is beautiful, this milk is tasty.” In the absence of all the senses, because of absence of knowledge of distinctions, only the one knowledge, non-dual Brahman, exists. “Then is there complete falsity in the objects perceived through error?” No. Error simply means to perceive a shell to be silver, when one is not aware that it is actually a shell and one then thinks “That is silver.” (The existence of shell and silver are not denied.)
One sees forms by the eye. The eye is the sense. The person is the doer. And the knowledge has form as its object. There is merely experience of variety in Brahman which is actually consciousness alone. The different elements of knowledge, characterized by the doer, the sense and the action, are created by māyā, the external energy. One should understand that they are not false. Jīva, created by ignorance, a function of Brahman, errs from his natural knowledge and develops infinite types of knowledge because of distinguishing doer, sense and action. There is the manifestation of error in the jīva because of the various types of knowledge, the various objects (artha-rūpa). Though pure Gaṅgā water exists, cows and donkeys have an illusion of its existence in water troughs because of their thirst. There is no knowledge without error for mankind.
Because of distinction of the senses, when they are turned towards the Lord (opposite of parācīnaiḥ) one can appreciate the sweet sound of Kṛṣna’s flute and the beauty of his form. Thus knowledge of distinctions in spiritual objects is not rejected. The devotees speak in the above way in relation to the Brahman feature of the Lord.
Purport
The Supreme Absolute Truth, the Personality of Godhead, is one, and He is spread everywhere by His impersonal feature. This is clearly expressed in
Bhagavad-gītā.
Lord Kṛṣṇa says, “Everything that is experienced is but an expansion of My energy.” Everything is sustained by Him, but that does not mean that He is in everything. Sense perceptions, such as aural perception of the sound of a drum, visual perception of a beautiful woman, or perception of the delicious taste of a milk preparation by the tongue, all come through different senses and are therefore differently understood. Therefore sensory knowledge is divided in different categories, although actually everything is one as a manifestation of the energy of the Supreme Lord. Similarly, the energies of fire are heat and illumination, and by these two energies fire can display itself in many varieties, or in diversified sense perception. Māyāvādī philosophers declare this diversity to be false. But Vaiṣṇava philosophers do not accept the different manifestations as false; they accept them as nondifferent from the Supreme Personality of Godhead because they are a display of His diverse energies.
The philosophy that the Absolute is true and this creation is false (
brahma satyaṁ jagan mithyā
) is not accepted by Vaiṣṇava philosophers. The example is given that although all that glitters is not gold, this does not mean that a glittering object is false. For example, an oyster shell appears to be golden; this appearance of golden hue is due only to the perception of the eyes, but that does not mean that the oyster shell is false. Similarly, by seeing the form of Lord Kṛṣṇa one cannot understand what He actually is, but this does not mean that He is false. The form of Kṛṣṇa has to be understood as it is described in the books of knowledge such as
Brahma-saṁhitā.
Īśvaraḥ paramaḥ kṛṣṇaḥ sac-cid-ānanda-vigrahaḥ:
Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, has an eternal, blissful, spiritual body. By our imperfect sense perception we cannot understand the form of the Lord. We have to acquire knowledge about Him. Therefore it is said here,
jṣānam ekam.
Bhagavad-gītā
confirms that they are fools who, simply upon seeing Kṛṣṇa, consider Him a common man. They do not know the unlimited knowledge, power and opulence of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Material sense speculation leads to the conclusion that the Supreme is formless. It is because of such mental speculation that the conditioned soul remains in ignorance under the spell of illusory energy. The Supreme Person has to be understood by the transcendental sound vibrated by Him in
Bhagavad-gītā,
wherein He says that there is nothing superior to Himself; the impersonal Brahman effulgence is resting on His personality. The purified, absolute vision of
Bhagavad-gītā
is compared to the river Ganges. Ganges water is so pure that it can purify even the asses and cows. But anyone who, disregarding the pure Ganges, wishes to be purified instead by the filthy water flowing in a drain, cannot be successful. Similarly, one can successfully attain pure knowledge of the Absolute only by hearing from the pure Absolute Himself.
In this verse it is clearly said that those who are averse to the Supreme Personality of Godhead speculate with their imperfect senses about the nature of the Absolute Truth. The formless Brahman conception, however, can be received only by aural reception and not by personal experience. Knowledge is therefore acquired by aural reception. It is confirmed in the
Vedānta-sūtra, śāstra-yonitvāt:
one has to acquire pure knowledge from the authorized scriptures. So-called speculative arguments about the Absolute Truth are therefore useless. The actual identity of the living entity is his consciousness, which is always present while the living entity is awake, dreaming or in deep sleep. Even in deep sleep, he can perceive by consciousness whether he is happy or distressed. Thus when consciousness is displayed through the medium of the subtle and gross material bodies, it is covered, but when the consciousness is purified, in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, one becomes free from the entanglement of repeated birth and death.
When uncontaminated pure knowledge is uncovered from the modes of material nature, the actual identity of the living entity is discovered: he is eternally a servitor of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The process of uncovering is like this: the rays of sunshine are luminous, and the sun itself is also luminous. In the presence of the sun, the rays illuminate just like the sun, but when the sunshine is covered by the spell of a cloud, or by
māyā,
then darkness, the imperfection of perception, begins. Therefore, to get out of the entanglement of the spell of nescience, one has to awaken his spiritual consciousness, or Kṛṣṇa consciousness, in terms of the authorized scriptures.