SB 4.23.22

SB 4.23.22

Devanagari

विधाय कृत्यं ह्रदिनीजलाप्लुता दत्त्वोदकं भर्तुरुदारकर्मण: । नत्वा दिविस्थांस्त्रिदशांस्त्रि: परीत्य विवेश वह्निं ध्यायती भर्तृपादौ ॥ २२ ॥

Verse text

vidhāya kṛtyaṁ hradinī-jalāplutā dattvodakaṁ bhartur udāra-karmaṇaḥ natvā divi-sthāṁs tridaśāṁs triḥ parītya viveśa vahniṁ dhyāyatī bhartṛ-pādau

Synonyms

vidhāya executing ; kṛtyam the regulative function ; hradinī in the water of the river ; jala āplutā — taking bath completely ; dattvā udakam offering oblations of water ; bhartuḥ of her husband ; udāra karmaṇaḥ — who was so liberal ; natvā offering obeisances ; divi sthān — situated in the sky ; tri daśān — the thirty million demigods ; triḥ three times ; parītya circumambulating ; viveśa entered ; vahnim the fire ; dhyāyatī while thinking of ; bhartṛ of her husband ; pādau the two lotus feet .

Translation

After this, the Queen executed the necessary funerary functions and offered oblations of water. After bathing in the river, she offered obeisances to various demigods situated in the sky in the different planetary systems. She then circumambulated the fire and, while thinking of the lotus feet of her husband, entered its flames.

Translation (Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura)

Performing the rites, taking bath in a lake, offering water to her husband of great fame, and offering respects to the thirty devatās, [Note: 12 Ādityas, 8 Vasus, 11 rudras and 2 Aśvins. This is actually thirty-three devatās.] she circumambulated the pyre three times and entered the fire while meditating on the feet of her husband. The devatās had come to see Pṛthu and she could see them in the sky. She went around the fire three times.

Purport

The entrance of a chaste wife into the flames of the pyre of her dead husband is known as saha-gamana, which means “dying with the husband.” This system of saha-gamana had been practiced in Vedic civilization from time immemorial. Even after the British period in India this practice was rigidly observed, but soon it degraded to the point that even when the wife was not strong enough to enter the fire of her dead husband, the relatives would force her to enter. Thus this practice had to be stopped, but even today there are still some solitary cases where a wife will voluntarily enter the fire and die with her husband. Even after 1940 we personally knew of a chaste wife who died in this way.