Bg. 2.26

BG 2.26

Devanagari

अथ चैनं नित्यजातं नित्यं वा मन्यसे मृतम् । तथापि त्वं महाबाहो नैनं शोचितुमर्हसि ॥ २६ ॥

Verse text

atha cainaṁ nitya-jātaṁ nityaṁ vā manyase mṛtam tathāpi tvaṁ mahā-bāho nainaṁ śocitum arhasi

Synonyms

atha if, however ; ca also ; enam this soul ; nitya-jātam always born ; nityam forever ; either ; manyase you so think ; mṛtam dead ; tathā api still ; tvam you ; mahā-bāho O mighty-armed one ; na never ; enam about the soul ; śocitum to lament ; arhasi deserve.

Translation

If, however, you think that the soul [or the symptoms of life] will always be born and die forever, you still have no reason to lament, O mighty-armed.

Translation (Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura)

26. Even if you think the soul is always born and always dies, still you should not lament, O Mighty-armed one!

Translation (Baladeva Vidyabhusana)

26. Even if you think the soul is continually born and always dies, still you should not lament, O Mighty-armed one!

Translation (Bhurijana Dasa)

If, however, you think that the soul [or the symptoms of life] is always born and dies forever, you still have no reason to lament, O mighty‑armed.

Purport

There is always a class of philosophers, almost akin to the Buddhists, who do not believe in the separate existence of the soul beyond the body. When Lord Kṛṣṇa spoke the Bhagavad-gītā, it appears that such philosophers existed, and they were known as the Lokāyatikas and Vaibhāṣikas. Such philosophers maintain that life symptoms take place at a certain mature condition of material combination. The modern material scientist and materialist philosophers also think similarly. According to them, the body is a combination of physical elements, and at a certain stage the life symptoms develop by interaction of the physical and chemical elements. The science of anthropology is based on this philosophy. Currently, many pseudo religions – now becoming fashionable in America – are also adhering to this philosophy, as are the nihilistic nondevotional Buddhist sects. Even if Arjuna did not believe in the existence of the soul – as in the Vaibhāṣika philosophy – there would still have been no cause for lamentation. No one laments the loss of a certain bulk of chemicals and stops discharging his prescribed duty. On the other hand, in modern science and scientific warfare, so many tons of chemicals are wasted for achieving victory over the enemy. According to the Vaibhāṣika philosophy, the so-called soul or ātmā vanishes along with the deterioration of the body. So, in any case, whether Arjuna accepted the Vedic conclusion that there is an atomic soul or he did not believe in the existence of the soul, he had no reason to lament. According to this theory, since there are so many living entities generating out of matter every moment, and so many of them are being vanquished every moment, there is no need to grieve for such incidents. If there were no rebirth for the soul, Arjuna had no reason to be afraid of being affected by sinful reactions due to his killing his grandfather and teacher. But at the same time, Kṛṣṇa sarcastically addressed Arjuna as mahā-bāhu, mighty-armed, because He, at least, did not accept the theory of the Vaibhāṣikas, which leaves aside the Vedic wisdom. As a kṣatriya, Arjuna belonged to the Vedic culture, and it behooved him to continue to follow its principles.

Purport (Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura)

“I have presented to you the conclusive truth according to the scripture. Now I will present the truth according to material vision. Please understand it.” Then He speaks this verse. If you think that the soul is always born (nitya-jātam) when the body is born, and always dies (nityaṁ mṛtam) with the death of the body, you should not lament for it. O mighty-armed Arjuna, being a brave kṣatriya, this war is your dharma. As Bhāgavatam says: kṣatriyāṇām ayaṁ dharmaḥ prajāpati-vinirmitaḥ bhrātāpi bhrātaraṁ hanyād yena ghoratamas tataḥ The code of sacred duty for warriors established by Lord Brahmā enjoins that one may have to kill even his own brother. That indeed is the most dreadful law.” SB 10.54.40

Purport (Baladeva Vidyabhusana)

Having given his own opinion on why one should not lament for the soul, the Lord now speaks of the opinion of others, in order to give other viewpoints. The student, knowing these viewpoints and consequently destroying them along with their contamination, , should remain fixed, victorious, in the Lord’s viewpoint. Endowed with a body such as human form, composed of the four elements, consciousness arises from that, just as red color arises from betel nut or the potency arises in liquor. That body made of four elements is itself the ātmā. This body is real, is subject to appearance and disappearance because of its nature of constant change, and this is known by regular perception. This is what the Lokayatas maintain. [Note: Cārvāka is their leader.] The Buddhists such as the Vaibhāsikas maintain that the ātmā is vijṣāna svarūpa, different from the body, but is still subject to destruction at every moment. In both these philosophies, there should be no lamentation for the ātmā. The word atha in this verse indicates other opinions. Ca means api, even. If you cannot understand My words about the nature of the soul, then you can take the support of other doctrines such as that of the Lokayatas. In this philosophy which claims that the body is the ātmā, you consider that this self, the body, is continually born and continually dies. The word vā means “and.” Therefore you should not lament for this self (body), with such words as “Alas, how strange it is that we are preparing to commit greatly sinful acts. Driven by the desire to enjoy royal happiness, we are intent on killing our own kinsmen.” (BG 1.44) This is because in these two philosophies there is no fear of sin continuing into next life, since there is no next birth, and there is unavoidable creation and destruction of the selves (body), whose very nature is change. The Lord then addressed Arjuna with a mocking tone. “O mighty-armed one! You, being the best of the warriors following Vedic traditions, should not hold such wrong views.”

Surrender Unto Me

This is Krsna's "check mate" on Arjuna: "If you think that the soul is eternal then you should fight, do your duty. And if you think that there is no soul, that life is just a symptom of the body which is composed of chemicals, then there will be no killing either. So you should still do your duty and fight!" "Do you think that by not fighting you will be able to stop their death?" Krsna defeats Arjuna's arguments again and again.