Devanagari
श्रीभगवानुवाच
सन्न्यास: कर्मयोगश्च नि:श्रेयसकरावुभौ ।
तयोस्तु कर्मसन्न्यासात्कर्मयोगो विशिष्यते ॥ २ ॥
Verse text
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
sannyāsaḥ karma-yogaś ca
niḥśreyasa-karāv ubhau
tayos tu karma-sannyāsāt
karma-yogo viśiṣyate
Synonyms
śrī-bhagavān uvāca
—
the Personality of Godhead said
;
sannyāsaḥ
—
renunciation of work
;
karma-yogaḥ
—
work in devotion
;
ca
—
also
;
niḥśreyasa-karau
—
leading to the path of liberation
;
ubhau
—
both
;
tayoḥ
—
of the two
;
tu
—
but
;
karma-sannyāsāt
—
in comparison to the renunciation of fruitive work
;
karma-yogaḥ
—
work in devotion
;
viśiṣyate
—
is better.
Translation
The Personality of Godhead replied: The renunciation of work and work in devotion are both good for liberation. But, of the two, work in devotional service is better than renunciation of work.
Translation (Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura)
2. The Lord said: Both renunciation of work and karma-yoga produce the highest benefit. But of the two, karma-yoga is better than renunciation of karma.
Translation (Baladeva Vidyabhusana)
2. The Lord said: Both renunciation of work and karma yoga produce the highest benefit. But of the two, karma yoga is better than renunciation of karma.
Purport
Fruitive activities (seeking sense gratification) are cause for material bondage. As long as one is engaged in activities aimed at improving the standard of bodily comfort, one is sure to transmigrate to different types of bodies, thereby continuing material bondage perpetually. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (5.5.4–6) confirms this as follows:
nūnaṁ pramattaḥ kurute vikarma yad indriya-prītaya āpṛṇoti na sādhu manye yata ātmano ’yam asann api kleśa-da āsa dehaḥ
parābhavas tāvad abodha-jāto yāvan na jijṣāsata ātma-tattvam yāvat kriyās tāvad idaṁ mano vai karmātmakaṁ yena śarīra-bandhaḥ
evaṁ manaḥ karma-vaśaṁ prayuṅkte avidyayātmany upadhīyamāne prītir na yāvan mayi vāsudeve na mucyate deha-yogena tāvat
“People are mad after sense gratification, and they do not know that this present body, which is full of miseries, is a result of one’s fruitive activities in the past. Although this body is temporary, it is always giving one trouble in many ways. Therefore, to act for sense gratification is not good. One is considered to be a failure in life as long as he makes no inquiry about his real identity. As long as he does not know his real identity, he has to work for fruitive results for sense gratification, and as long as one is engrossed in the consciousness of sense gratification one has to transmigrate from one body to another. Although the mind may be engrossed in fruitive activities and influenced by ignorance, one must develop a love for devotional service to Vāsudeva. Only then can one have the opportunity to get out of the bondage of material existence.”
Therefore, jṣāna (or knowledge that one is not this material body but spirit soul) is not sufficient for liberation. One has to act in the status of spirit soul, otherwise there is no escape from material bondage. Action in Kṛṣṇa consciousness is not, however, action on the fruitive platform. Activities performed in full knowledge strengthen one’s advancement in real knowledge. Without Kṛṣṇa consciousness, mere renunciation of fruitive activities does not actually purify the heart of a conditioned soul. As long as the heart is not purified, one has to work on the fruitive platform. But action in Kṛṣṇa consciousness automatically helps one escape the result of fruitive action so that one need not descend to the material platform. Therefore action in Kṛṣṇa consciousness is always superior to renunciation, which always entails a risk of falling. Renunciation without Kṛṣṇa consciousness is incomplete, as is confirmed by Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī in his Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu (1.2.258):
prāpaṣcikatayā buddhyā hari-sambandhi-vastunaḥ mumukṣubhiḥ parityāgo vairāgyaṁ phalgu kathyate
“When persons eager to achieve liberation renounce things related to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, thinking them to be material, their renunciation is called incomplete.” Renunciation is complete when it is in the knowledge that everything in existence belongs to the Lord and that no one should claim proprietorship over anything. One should understand that, factually, nothing belongs to anyone. Then where is the question of renunciation? One who knows that everything is Kṛṣṇa’s property is always situated in renunciation. Since everything belongs to Kṛṣṇa, everything should be employed in the service of Kṛṣṇa. This perfect form of action in Kṛṣṇa consciousness is far better than any amount of artificial renunciation by a sannyāsī of the Māyāvādī school.
Purport (Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura)
Karma-yoga is better. Even for the jṣānī, performing action is not at all a fault. Rather, by performance of niṣkāma-karma, the heart becomes fixed in purity. From that, jṣāna becomes fixed. Sometimes there may arise disturbance in the heart of the sannyāsī. In order to alleviate that disturbance, is it forbidden to engage in karma? Disturbance in the heart certainly obstructs the practice of jṣāna, but taking up enjoyment of sense objects (rather than performing niṣkāma-karma) is a real degradation.
Purport (Baladeva Vidyabhusana)
Asked by Arjuna, the Lord spoke. Both are beneficial, since they both lead to liberation. But karma yoga is better than jṣāna yoga (karma saṁnyāsāt).
The meaning is this. Karma yoga does not bear the same faults that arise in practicing jṣāna, but because of containing jṣāna within it, it makes jṣāna steady. For one who has renounced action because of steadiness in jṣāna, if he develops a fault in the consciousness, he must perform karma yoga to correct the fault. This is the injunction of scriptures for remedying the problem. Statements indicating renunciation of action say that when one attains absorption in ātmā, then all actions leave that person spontaneously. Therefore karma yoga is better because it is easier to perform, because it is safer, and because it contains jṣāna within it.
Surrender Unto Me
The question isn't which path is superior. The question is: which path is better in the sense of more practical and easy. And this is explained in the next Text.